From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minniti v. Minniti

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 1984
445 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-226.

February 21, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Lewis B. Whitworth, Judge.

Penzick Parker and John Parker, Miami, for appellant.

Siegfried, Kipnis, Gross Schoninger and Tom Hall, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.


We are unable to hold that the award of the husband's interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony constituted an abuse of discretion and therefore affirm that aspect of the judgment under review. Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1983); Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The wife has conceded error in the amounts of child support and the cause is consequently remanded for redetermination of that issue. Upon remand, the trial court will also be free to spell out any required details of the general terms of the "shared custody" provision of the final judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.


Summaries of

Minniti v. Minniti

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 1984
445 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Minniti v. Minniti

Case Details

Full title:FRED J. MINNITI, APPELLANT, v. RUTH GWEN MINNITI, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 21, 1984

Citations

445 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Manrique v. Manrique

Although we might not have made such an award if we were making the initial determination, see Bible v.…