From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minnesota v. Barry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 21, 2018
Civil No. 18-505 (DWF/SER) (D. Minn. Jun. 21, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-505 (DWF/SER)

06-21-2018

State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Dominic Junior Barry, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated May 25, 2018. (Doc. No. 5.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's May 25, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [5]) is ADOPTED.

2. Barry's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED.

3. Barry's "Notice of Removal" (Doc. No. [1]) is VACATED.

4. This action is REMANDED to the State District Court for Hennepin County, Minnesota.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 21, 2018

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Minnesota v. Barry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 21, 2018
Civil No. 18-505 (DWF/SER) (D. Minn. Jun. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Minnesota v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Dominic Junior Barry, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 21, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 18-505 (DWF/SER) (D. Minn. Jun. 21, 2018)