Opinion
No. 12-1001 No. 12-1003 No. 12-1004 No. 12-1005
06-05-2012
In re: MINH VU HOANG, Debtor, MINH VU HOANG, Defendant - Appellant, v. UHY ADVISORS FLYS, INC., Third Party Defendant - Appellee, and GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee. In re: MINH VU HOANG; THANH HOANG Debtors, MINH VU HOANG, Defendant - Appellant, v. GARY A. ROSEN; ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Trustees - Appellees. In re: MINH VU HOANG, Debtor, MINH VU HOANG, Defendant - Appellant, v. MARION A. HECHT; JEFFREY K. BERNSTEIN; GOODMAN SOLUTIONS, LLC; GOODMAN & COMPANY, LLP, Third Party Defendants - Appellees, and ROGER SCHLOSSBERG; GARY A. ROSEN, Trustees. In re: MINH VU HOANG, Debtor, MINH VU HOANG, Defendant - Appellant, v. GARY A. ROSEN; TRUSTEE ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Third Party Defendants - Appellees, and GARY A. ROSEN, Individually; GARY A. ROSEN, Chartered, Trustees.
Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Alan M. Grochal, Catherine Keller Hopkin, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland; Roger Schlossberg, SCHLOSSBERG & ASSOCIATES, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-02641-DKC; 8:11-cv-02642-DKC; 8:11-cv-02653-DKC; 8:11-cv-02654; 05-21078; 11-00001)
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Alan M. Grochal, Catherine Keller Hopkin, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland; Roger Schlossberg, SCHLOSSBERG & ASSOCIATES, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court's orders dismissing as frivolous her appeal from the bankruptcy court's orders in the underlying proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoang v. UHY Advisors FKYS, Inc., Nos. 8:11-cv-02641-DKC; 05-21078; 11-00001; Hoang v. Rosen, Nos. 8:11-cv-02642-DKC; 05-21078; 11-00001; Hoang v. Hecht, Nos. 8:11-cv-02653-DKC; 05-21078; 11-00001; Hoang v. Gary Rosen, Nos. 8:11-cv-02654-DKC; 05-21078; 11-00001; (D. Md. Dec. 13, 2011). We deny Hoang's motion to appoint counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED