From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MINH v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Aug 22, 2006
No. CV 306-061 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006)

Summary

In Minh v. United States, 2006 WL 2444085 *3 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006), the Court held that BOP's use of BICE detainers in deciding prisoners' eligibility for prison programs and early release did not offend equal protection principles. Courts have routinely upheld the Bureau's consideration of BICE detainers in making classification decisions regarding inmates, including such issues as security level and eligibility for prison programs.

Summary of this case from Whittaker v. U.S.

Opinion

No. CV 306-061.

August 22, 2006


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MINH v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Aug 22, 2006
No. CV 306-061 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006)

In Minh v. United States, 2006 WL 2444085 *3 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006), the Court held that BOP's use of BICE detainers in deciding prisoners' eligibility for prison programs and early release did not offend equal protection principles. Courts have routinely upheld the Bureau's consideration of BICE detainers in making classification decisions regarding inmates, including such issues as security level and eligibility for prison programs.

Summary of this case from Whittaker v. U.S.

In Minh v. United States, 2006 WL 2444085 *3 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006), the Court held that BOP's use of BICE detainers in deciding prisoners' eligibility for prison programs and early release did not offend equal protection principles. Courts have routinely upheld the Bureau's consideration of BICE detainers in making classification decisions regarding inmates, including such issues as security level and eligibility for prison programs.

Summary of this case from Estupinan v. U.S.

In Minh, the Court held that BOP's use of BICE detainers in deciding prisoners' eligibility for prison programs and early release did not offend equal protection principles. Courts have routinely upheld the Bureau's consideration of BICE detainers in making classification decisions regarding inmates, including such issues as security level and eligibility for prison programs.

Summary of this case from MINA v. U.S.
Case details for

MINH v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:NGUYEN KIEU MINH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Aug 22, 2006

Citations

No. CV 306-061 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2006)

Citing Cases

Woodard v. Quintana

Some case law indicates that the term "execution of a sentence" encompasses a challenge to the place of…

Whittaker v. U.S.

); Lyle v. Sivley, 805 F.Supp. 755, 759-60 (D. Ariz. 1990) (holding that Due Process Clause does not give…