From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 77633

December 12, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE MICHAEL DAVID

S. Paige Canfield, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, P.O. Box 899, Breck K. Burgess, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.

ORDER



Lucky Bill Miner ("Movant") appeals the order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing as Movant was deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to move to sever his trial from that of his co-defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gaertner, P.J., Crahan, J., and Draper III, J.


Summaries of

Miner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Miner v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUCKY BILL MINER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

34 S.W.3d 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)