Mincy v. Veal

Full title: JOSEPH MINCY, Petitioner, v. MARTIN VEAL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

CV 07-3973-AHS (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2009)

Opinion

JOSEPH MINCY, Petitioner, v. MARTIN VEAL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 07-3973-AHS (DTB) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 8, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          ALICEMARIE H. STOTLER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.