From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mincey v. Mensch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.)


An issue of fact exists as to whether the defect in the corner curb where plaintiff fell was caused by cars driving over the curb in the course of entering and exiting the vacant lot (used as a parking lot) that lay between the curb and defendants' buildings ( see, Montalvo v. Western Estates, 240 A.D.2d 45). That plaintiff did not trip over the part of the curb that was cut to provide entrance to the lot, but rather over the part located at the corner some distance away from the curb cut, does not eliminate the possibility, at this early stage of the action, that the individual defendants' alleged special use of the sidewalk produced a proximate cause of the fall.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Mincey v. Mensch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mincey v. Mensch

Case Details

Full title:DALE MINCEY et al., Respondents, v. STEVEN MENSCH et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

Stockdale v. the City of New York

An issue of fact exists as to whether the sidewalk defect that allegedly caused plaintiff's fall was created…

Moran v. City of New York

An issue of fact exists as to whether the alleged defect in the sidewalk where plaintiff fell was caused by…