Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Demond Maurice Mimms, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Robert E. Coyle, Senior Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-00144-REC/DLB.
Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Demond Maurice Mimms, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants sentenced him to an unconstitutional prison term. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Mimms's action because his challenge concerns the legality of his detention, and a
Page 166.
judgment in his favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of his continued confinement. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).
AFFIRMED.