From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milsap v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1969
32 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

July 8, 1969


Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in a highway appropriation case, which was previously remitted by us for appropriate findings (see 32 A.D.2d 586, in which the essential facts appear) in accordance with which a supplemental decision of the Court of Claims has been filed. The resulting award of $7,371 has adequate support in the record. While the after value of $53,499 is still substantially greater than any after value testified to, analysis of the decision in light of the factual findings now supplied adequately explains how the court arrived at this figure, the other components of the award being within the range of expert testimony. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Reynolds, J.P., Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum per Curiam; Aulisi, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Milsap v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 1969
32 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Milsap v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR C. MILSAP et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
302 N.Y.S.2d 606

Citing Cases

St. Lawrence Shores v. State of N.Y

We believe our values and damages are within the component parts of the appraisal testimony presented. (…