From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 24, 1996
672 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-02356.

April 24, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; R. Earl Collins, Acting Circuit Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges the sentence imposed upon him after he pled no contest to two counts of simple battery and one count of resisting an officer without violence. The appellant was sentenced to two consecutive years of probation for the battery charges, and we find no flaw in that aspect of the sentence. However, we agree with the appellant that a fine and certain costs imposed upon him as conditions of probation are improper.

The cost of $2 for the criminal justice education fund under section 943.25 (13), Florida Statutes (1995), is a discretionary cost and may not be imposed without oral notification to the defendant. The state concedes that this item was not orally pronounced at sentencing.

The fine of $500 pursuant to section 775.0835, Florida Statutes (1995), must be stricken because it was imposed without notice and without findings required by the statute. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Additional costs under section 27.3455 (1) are determined by the offense level and can be levied only per case and not per count. Thus, for his two misdemeanors, the appellant may be assessed only $50. See Faulk v. State, 661 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

For the foregoing reasons, we strike the fine and costs listed above as being improper in this case. We also correct a scrivener's error in the judgment and sentence which describes the "degree of crime" as "F" when it should be "M."

With these changes in the judgment and sentence, we affirm.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 24, 1996
672 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN ALBERT MILLS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 24, 1996

Citations

672 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

McNeil v. State

Id. However, the case cited as the basis for this general rule, Mills v. State , 672 So.2d 873, 873–74 (Fla.…

X.S. v. State

However, it is clear from the text of Webster that the costs at issue were not imposed pursuant to section…