From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
May 17, 2006
Civil No. 06-2007 (W.D. Ark. May. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-2007.

May 17, 2006


ORDER


Now on this 17th day of May 2006, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on March 15, 2006, by the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, this action is dismissed on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
May 17, 2006
Civil No. 06-2007 (W.D. Ark. May. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARL RAY MILLS Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS; SHERIFF MIKE ALLEN; PAROLE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: May 17, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-2007 (W.D. Ark. May. 17, 2006)