From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 18, 2011
CV 11-0812 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion


DANIEL ANDREW MILLS, Petitioner, v. LINDA SANDERS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 11-0812 United States District Court, C.D. California. March 18, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice.


Summaries of

Mills v. Sanders

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 18, 2011
CV 11-0812 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Mills v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL ANDREW MILLS, Petitioner, v. LINDA SANDERS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

Citations

CV 11-0812 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2011)