From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Malim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-1852 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1852 JFM (PC)

01-31-2013

JOSHUA DANIEL MILLS, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE MALIM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 27, 2012, defendant Steven Vladesov filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint after plaintiff was granted leave to serve said defendant by publication. See Order filed June 20, 2012 (Doc. No. 57). Good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to defendant Vladesov a copy of the form Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge (Consent Form); and

2. Within seven days from the date of this order defendant Vladesov shall determine whether to consent or decline to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), complete the Consent Form in accordance with that determination, and file the completed form.

________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mills v. Malim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-1852 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Mills v. Malim

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DANIEL MILLS, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE MALIM, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1852 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)