From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
1:21-cv-01193-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01193-DAD-HBK

04-07-2022

THOMAS K. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. I.Z. JONES, J. RIVERA, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

(DOC. NO. 85)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs fourth motion to appoint counsel. (Doc. Nos. 85). Plaintiff previously filed motions seeking appointment of counsel on September 30, 2021, February 9, 2022, and February 18, 2022, all which were denied by the Court. (Doc. Nos. 10, 14, 65, 68, 81). Plaintiffs fourth motion to appoint counsel raises no new grounds from his previous motions. The Court incorporates its reasons and the law set forth in the Court's October 6, 2021, Order as through set out at length herein. (Doc. No. 14).

Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel (Doc. Nos. 85) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
1:21-cv-01193-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Mills v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS K. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. I.Z. JONES, J. RIVERA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01193-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)