Milligan v. Quintana

Full title: OMAR MILLIGAN, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

CV 10-6538 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2011)

Opinion

OMAR MILLIGAN, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-6538 United States District Court, C.D. California. January 27, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice.