From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millett v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02349-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-02349-KJD-VCF

01-13-2017

KYLE MILLETT, individually, Plaintiff, v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, individually; and DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

BRIAN P. CLARK Nevada Bar No. 4236 LUKAS B. McCOURT Nevada Bar No. 11839 CLARK MCCOURT 7371 Prairie Falcon Road, Ste. 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Telephone: (702) 474-0065 Facsimile: (702) 474-0068 bpc@clarkmccourt.com lmccourt@clarkmccourt.com Attorneys for Plaintiff David J. Feldman Nevada Bar No. 5947 FELDMAN GRAF, P.C. 8845 West Flamingo Road, Suite 110 Las Vegas, NV 89147 Attorney for Defendant


BRIAN P. CLARK
Nevada Bar No. 4236
LUKAS B. McCOURT
Nevada Bar No. 11839
CLARK MCCOURT
7371 Prairie Falcon Road, Ste. 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: (702) 474-0065
Facsimile: (702) 474-0068
bpc@clarkmccourt.com
lmccourt@clarkmccourt.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request)

Pursuant to LR-6-1, Plaintiff Kyle Millett and Defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company, by and through their respective counsel of record, respectfully submit the following stipulation requesting a ten (10) day extension for Plaintiff to file his Response To Defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company's Motion For Summary Judgment Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 56, to and including January 20, 2017. Defendant's motion was filed December 20, 2016. In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows:

I. Introduction

Plaintiff is the assignee of the rights of Defendant's insured, Tamara Craig, related to claims Tamara Craig may have against Defendant Mid-Century for failure to defend and indemnify Craig for a personal injury judgment obtained by Plaintiff. Defendant Mid-Century filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims brought by Plaintiff Millett.

II. Reason for Extension

Plaintiff seeks the extension to address the potential for settlement of his claims. This is the first request for extension.

The parties believe that a case resolution can be achieved in the next 10 days without the need to expend resources in responding to Defendant's motion.

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

DATED this 10 day of January, 2017. /s/_________
Brian P. Clark
Lukas B. McCourt
Clark McCourt
7371 Prairie Falcon Road, Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED this 10 day of January, 2017. /s/_________
David J. Feldman
Nevada Bar No. 5947
FELDMAN GRAF, P.C.
8845 West Flamingo Road, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Dated: January 13, 2017


Summaries of

Millett v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02349-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Millett v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KYLE MILLETT, individually, Plaintiff, v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-02349-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)