Opinion
Argued January 26, 1892
Decided March 15, 1892
John W. Houston for appellant.
George W. Miller for respondent.
LANDON, J., reads for reversal.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Miller v. Union Switch and Signal Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 15, 1892
30 N.E. 265 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Miller v. Union Switch and Signal Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 15, 1892
30 N.E. 265 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Miller v. Union Switch and Signal Company
Case Details
Full title:FRANK W. MILLER, Respondent, v . THE UNION SWITCH AND SIGNAL COMPANY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 15, 1892
Citations
30 N.E. 265 (N.Y. 1892)
30 N.E. 265
43 N.Y. St. Rptr. 670
Citing Cases
Carvill v. Mirror Films, Inc.
It is clear, of course, that if Carvill had brought suit upon his undivided cause of action the mere fact…