From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Steinheimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 25, 2017
3:16-CV-0317-MMD (VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2017)

Opinion

3:16-CV-0317-MMD (VPC)

10-25-2017

MARTIN KARL MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE STEINHEIMER, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This report and recommendation is made to the Honorable Miranda M. Du, United States District Judge. The action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice, LR IB 1-4.

On June 10, 2016, the court received plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and a civil rights complaint. On June 8, 2017, found plaintiff's declaration insufficient for the court rule on the application as he had been released from custody (ECF No. 4). The court ordered plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners on or before June 26, 2017. (Id.) Plaintiff failed to respond to this court's order.

Based upon the foregoing, the undersigned magistrate judge recommends that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) be denied and this action be dismissed without prejudice.

The parties should be aware of the following:

1. They may file, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule IB 3-2 of the Local Rules of Practice, specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of receipt. These objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" and should be accompanied by points and authorities for consideration by the District Court.

2. This Report and Recommendation is not an appealable order, and any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. App. P., should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment.

RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons stated above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Judge enter an order as follows:

1. DENYING plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1); and

2. DISMISSING this action without prejudice.

DATED: October 25, 2017.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Steinheimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 25, 2017
3:16-CV-0317-MMD (VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Miller v. Steinheimer

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN KARL MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE STEINHEIMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 25, 2017

Citations

3:16-CV-0317-MMD (VPC) (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2017)