finding no "important and urgent reason for immediate determination by this Court" under Supreme Court Rule 41, because "it would not terminate the litigation as there are numerous parties and policies that remain" even if the Court granted the petition
Summary of this case from Hechinger Investment Company of DelawareNo. 382, 1993.
Decided: April 29, 1994.
Appeal from Superior CrA IN91-05-1822 AND IN-91-05-1823.
AFFIRMED.
finding no "important and urgent reason for immediate determination by this Court" under Supreme Court Rule 41, because "it would not terminate the litigation as there are numerous parties and policies that remain" even if the Court granted the petition
Summary of this case from Hechinger Investment Company of DelawareFull title:MILLER v. STATE
Court:Superior Court of Delaware
Date published: Apr 29, 1994
In that case, the defendant did not establish that his state of mind was connected to the victim's prior…
State v. MorganThis May 23, 1994 date is when the judgment of conviction became final for Rule 61 purposes.Morgan v. State,…