denying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. SmithNo. 553, 2016
02-24-2017
Sylvester MILLER, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
denying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. Smithdenying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. McCarydenying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. Richardsdenying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. McNairdenying a Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. Halldenying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. Cannondenying Rule 35 motion attacking sufficiency of evidence in indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty; defendant's "challenge [of] his indictment is outside the scope of Rule 35" and was limited to Rule 61
Summary of this case from State v. StanfordFull title:Sylvester MILLER, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.
Date published: Feb 24, 2017
See, e.g., Warnick v. State, 158 A.3d 884, 2017 WL 1056130, at *1 & n.5 (Del. Mar. 30, 2017) (TABLE) (citing…
State v. SmithDel. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(a)(1). See, e.g., Warnick v. State, 158 A.3d 884, 2017 WL 1056130, at *1 & n.5…