From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 13, 2013
404 S.W.3d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. WD 75730.

2013-08-13

Charles L. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Daviess County, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge. Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, Mo, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Daviess County, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, Mo, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.

Order


PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 13, 2013
404 S.W.3d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles L. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 13, 2013

Citations

404 S.W.3d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)