From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
May 29, 2001
45 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77678

May 29, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HONORABLE ANNA C. FORDER.

Mary S. Choi; Assistant Public Defender; 1221 Locust, Suite 350; St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General, John Morris; Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899; Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before May K. Hoff, C.J. and Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Movant, James Miller, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends his counsel provided ineffective assistance when she misrepresented his chances of being acquitted and thereby coerced him into pleading guilty. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
May 29, 2001
45 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MILLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: May 29, 2001

Citations

45 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)