From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Spencer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1994
858 P.2d 924 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

WCB 90-21911; CA A78348

Argued and submitted September 3, affirmed October 6, reconsideration denied December 15, 1993, petition for review denied January 18, 1994 ( 318 Or. 326)

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Dan Steelhammer, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Brothers, Drew Steelhammer, Bend.

Stephen P. Forte, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Carl Spencer.

Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Department of Insurance and Finance. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

No appearance by respondent SAIF Corporation.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.


Affirmed. Ferland v. McMurtry Video Productions, 116 Or. App. 405, 841 P.2d 1200 (1992).


Summaries of

Miller v. Spencer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1994
858 P.2d 924 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Miller v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Complying Status of Spencer House Moving Company…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 18, 1994

Citations

858 P.2d 924 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
858 P.2d 924