From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Sawyer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Apr 28, 2006
Case No. 3:05CV155 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05CV155.

April 28, 2006


ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY


The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Sawyer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Apr 28, 2006
Case No. 3:05CV155 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Miller v. Sawyer

Case Details

Full title:CARLA MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MACK SAWYER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Apr 28, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05CV155 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2006)