From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Progressive Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 25, 2007
478 Mich. 863 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

No. 131987.

May 25, 2007.

Court of Appeals No. 259504.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal.

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff is "named in the policy" within the meaning of MCL 500.3114(1) where the policy states, "The Declarations, endorsements and application are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this policy" but the Declarations sheet effective February 2, 2001, which lists the plaintiff as an occasional driver, is preceded by a clause stating, "Your Policy Premium Is Based On The Following Information Which Is Not Part Of The Policy." The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Miller v. Progressive Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 25, 2007
478 Mich. 863 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

Miller v. Progressive Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DAWN MARIE MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 25, 2007

Citations

478 Mich. 863 (Mich. 2007)
731 N.W.2d 425