From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Paul

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1944 —

Decided September 14, 1944.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 130 N.J.L. 248.

For the appellant, Samuel Rosenblatt and Joseph J. Corn.

For the respondents, Brunetto Welsh.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Miller v. Paul

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)
Case details for

Miller v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 14, 1944

Citations

39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)
39 A.2d 135