From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Najera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
CASE No. 1:12-cv-01288-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CASE No. 1:12-cv-01288-AWI-MJS (PC)

03-29-2013

STEVEN R. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT NAJERA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS


(ECF No. 2)

Plaintiff Steven R. Miller, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se filed this civil rights action on July 30, 2012 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (ECF No. 1.) On July 30, 2012, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), which is now before the Court.

On August 13, 2012, Plaintiff paid the filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Najera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
CASE No. 1:12-cv-01288-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. Najera

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN R. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT NAJERA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

CASE No. 1:12-cv-01288-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)