From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Motor Coach Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 29, 1932
127 Cal.App. 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 7248.

November 29, 1932.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. H.S. Gans, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

B.P. Gibbs and Walter W. Little for Appellants.

George F. Rankin for Respondent.


As the result of three actions which arose from allegedly negligent operation of a motor-bus and a private automobile at an intersection of public thoroughfares, consolidated for the purposes of trial, judgments were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants presented separate appeals therefrom upon the same transcript. The instant appeal is from one of said judgments, entered in favor of a passenger of said automobile.

[1] The questions involved herein are identical with those decided in the case of Harlow v. Motor Coach Co., (Civil No. 7246) ante, p. 728 [ 16 P.2d 779]. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Miller v. Motor Coach Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 29, 1932
127 Cal.App. 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Miller v. Motor Coach Company

Case Details

Full title:T.S. MILLER, Respondent, v. MOTOR COACH COMPANY (a Corporation) et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Nov 29, 1932

Citations

127 Cal.App. 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
16 P.2d 781