From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 30, 2023
2:23-CV-0994-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0994-DMC-P

05-30-2023

ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW MONTGOMERY, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted.

The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 30, 2023
2:23-CV-0994-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW MONTGOMERY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 30, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0994-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2023)