From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jul 31, 1974
314 N.E.2d 443 (Mass. 1974)

Summary

In Miller v. Miller, 366 Mass. 846 (1974), a husband who had obtained a divorce claimed, as a matter of law, that the judge should have eliminated all alimony obligations where his wife, intending to embarrass and injure him, had conducted herself in such "a scandalous manner by committing adultery" that her conduct affected his ability to conduct his business.

Summary of this case from Singer v. Singer

Opinion

July 31, 1974.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Margaret F. McGovern for the petitioner.

Arthur H. Bloomberg for the respondent.


The petitioner (husband) appeals from a decree which reduced but did not eliminate his obligation to pay alimony to the respondent (wife). The husband sought to modify the alimony payable by him under the terms of a decree nisi granting him a divorce. The Probate Court judge found that after the entry of the decree nisi, and before the decree became absolute, the wife openly and with the intention of embarrassing and injuring the husband and his reputation "conducted herself in a scandalous manner by committing adultery to the extent that such conduct did in fact affect the . . . [husband] and his ability to carry on his business or to get new business as he had formerly done." The judge reduced the husband's alimony obligation to the wife. The wife has not appealed. The husband has, arguing that as matter of law the judge should have eliminated all alimony obligations. Our law is to the contrary. The judge has discretion concerning the reduction, if any, in alimony obligations which might be appropriate in such circumstances. G.L.c. 208, § 37. See Graves v. Graves, 108 Mass. 314, 317-318, 321 (1871); O'Brien v. O'Brien, 325 Mass. 573, 577-578 (1950); Brown v. Greenlow, 330 Mass. 88, 89-90 (1953); Richman v. Richman, 335 Mass. 395, 396-397 (1957); Surabian v. Surabian, 362 Mass. 342, 348-349 (1972). There is no showing that the judge abused his discretion. Because the wife has not appealed, it is not open to her to object to the decree. Brown v. Greenlow, supra, at 90.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jul 31, 1974
314 N.E.2d 443 (Mass. 1974)

In Miller v. Miller, 366 Mass. 846 (1974), a husband who had obtained a divorce claimed, as a matter of law, that the judge should have eliminated all alimony obligations where his wife, intending to embarrass and injure him, had conducted herself in such "a scandalous manner by committing adultery" that her conduct affected his ability to conduct his business.

Summary of this case from Singer v. Singer
Case details for

Miller v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:ELWYNN J. MILLER vs. JEAN M. MILLER

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jul 31, 1974

Citations

314 N.E.2d 443 (Mass. 1974)
366 Mass. 846

Citing Cases

Singer v. Singer

Alimony was not precluded, even when the conduct of the guilty (used in the sense of the party against whom…