From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. McCown-Hall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-16-2015

In the Matter of Patricia MILLER, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Shyneka McCOWN–HALL, Respondent–Appellant.

Deborah J. Scinta, Orchard Park, for Respondent–Appellant. RONALD M. CINELLI, Attorney for the Children, Buffalo.


Deborah J. Scinta, Orchard Park, for Respondent–Appellant.

RONALD M. CINELLI, Attorney for the Children, Buffalo.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DeJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, respondent mother appeals from an order that granted petitioner paternal grandmother visitation with the subject children. As an initial matter, we note that it is undisputed that the paternal grandmother has standing to seek visitation pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 72(1) because the children's father is deceased (see Matter of E.S. v. P.D., 8 N.Y.3d 150, 157, 831 N.Y.S.2d 96, 863 N.E.2d 100 ; see generally Matter of Wilson v. McGlinchey, 2 N.Y.3d 375, 380, 779 N.Y.S.2d 159, 811 N.E.2d 526 ). We agree with the Attorney for the Children that Family Court properly determined that visitation with the paternal grandmother is in the children's best interests (see Matter of Varney v. McKee, 44 A.D.3d 1178, 1179, 845 N.Y.S.2d 475 ). We agree with the mother, however, that the court abused its discretion in awarding the paternal grandmother excessive visitation that " deprived the mother of significant quality time with the children" (Matter of Dubiel v. Schaefer, 108 A.D.3d 1093, 1095, 969 N.Y.S.2d 311 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cesario v. Cesario, 168 A.D.2d 911, 911, 565 N.Y.S.2d 653 ). We therefore modify the order accordingly.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating that part of the second ordering paragraph directing that petitioner have visitation "each and every Thanksgiving" and inserting in place thereof a direction that petitioner have visitation "in odd years on Thanksgiving," vacating that part of the third ordering paragraph directing that petitioner have visitation "each and every Christmas Day" and inserting in place thereof a direction that petitioner have visitation "in even years on Christmas Day," inserting an ordering paragraph directing that petitioner's weekend visitation shall not apply to any part of the weekend beginning on December 25, 2015, and modifying the fourth ordering paragraph by inserting that petitioner shall not have weekend visitation in the month of July in even years and shall not have weekend visitation in the month of August in odd years, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Miller v. McCown-Hall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Miller v. McCown-Hall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Patricia MILLER, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Shyneka…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 16, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 1386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
21 N.Y.S.3d 514