From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. LVMPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 28, 2017
2:17-cv-02021-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 28, 2017)

Opinion

2:17-cv-02021-RFB-NJK

07-28-2017

DUSTON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LVMPD et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff, who is a prisoner in the custody of the Clark County Detention Center, has submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 1-1).

Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, Plaintiff must complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis and attach both an inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate. Plaintiff has not submitted a properly executed financial certificate. (See ECF No. 1 at 4). As such, the in forma pauperis application is denied without prejudice. The Court will retain Plaintiff's civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it until the matter of the payment of the filing fee is resolved. Plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to cure the deficiencies of his application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, pay the full filing fee for this action. If Plaintiff chooses to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis he must file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Plaintiff must have an authorized jail official complete the financial certificate. --------

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED without prejudice to file a new application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than August 28, 2017, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachments in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but shall not file it at this time.

DATED: This 28th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. LVMPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 28, 2017
2:17-cv-02021-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Miller v. LVMPD

Case Details

Full title:DUSTON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LVMPD et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 28, 2017

Citations

2:17-cv-02021-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 28, 2017)