From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Lucas

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Aug 15, 2019
No. 02-18-00266-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2019)

Summary

In Miller, our sister appellate court extended an appellant's briefing deadline on the appellant's motions six times for a total of seven months beyond the original briefing deadline.

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Henderson

Opinion

No. 02-18-00266-CV

08-15-2019

JERALD H. MILLER, Appellant v. SHEREE LUCAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 236th District Court Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 236-291993-17 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant's brief originally was due on December 19, 2018. He then filed several motions for extensions, relying on his medical conditions and illnesses to justify the extensions. The court granted a 60-day extension until February 19, 2019, and then a 38-day extension until March 29, 2019, which included a warning that "NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED."

Appellant nonetheless filed an additional motion for an extension of time on April 2, 2019, and the court granted his motion in part and ordered him to file his brief by April 26, 2019, or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution with no further notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant filed a brief, but because it did not comply with the requirements in rule of appellate procedure 38.1, we instructed him to file a compliant amended brief by May 17, 2019, warning him that failure to do so could result in striking the brief he had filed and dismissal of the appeal or waiver of noncomplying points. No amended brief was forthcoming, and so on May 31, 2019, we notified appellant we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by June 10, 2019, he filed the amended brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). On June 12, 2019, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time, asking for "one other extension in which to file his amended brief to at least July 8, 2019."

The court granted appellant's motion and ordered his amended brief due by July 8, 2019.

Instead of filing his amended brief, however, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time, requesting an additional extension until July 29, 2019, and the court granted the motion, ordered his brief due July 29, 2019, and included the warning that "NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED."

On August 1, 2019, appellant filed another motion for extension of time. Because appellant has failed to file his amended brief even after we afforded ample opportunities to do so, we deny his motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam Delivered: August 15, 2019


Summaries of

Miller v. Lucas

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Aug 15, 2019
No. 02-18-00266-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2019)

In Miller, our sister appellate court extended an appellant's briefing deadline on the appellant's motions six times for a total of seven months beyond the original briefing deadline.

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Henderson
Case details for

Miller v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:JERALD H. MILLER, Appellant v. SHEREE LUCAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Aug 15, 2019

Citations

No. 02-18-00266-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Henderson

While we do not condone parties failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure and court orders,…