From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Knauer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 29, 2014
Case No. 1:13-cv-356 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-356

01-29-2014

JEFFREY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JEFF KNAUER, Defendant.


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff initiated this pro se action against his supervisor at the United States Postal Service in the Hamilton County, Ohio Municipal Court asserting violations of his rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (Doc. 1, Ex. 1). Defendant removed the matter to this Court as it involved a federal question. (Doc. 1). On June 26, 2013, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; defendant also moved to substitute the United States of America as the defendant. (Docs. 3, 4). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2, plaintiff was to file his memorandum in opposition within twenty-one days. S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2(a)(2). Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion to dismiss within the prescribed time.

On January 10, 2014, this Court Ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing and within fourteen days, why defendant's pending motion to dismiss should not be construed as unopposed and granted for the reasons stated in the motion. (Doc. 6). This Order was sent to plaintiff via certified mail and received by plaintiff no later than January 11, 2014. (Doc. 7). To date, plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's Show Cause Order or to respond to the motion to dismiss.

Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this matter and to obey an Order of the Court warrants dismissal of this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109- 10 (6th Cir. 1991). District courts have the power to sua sponte dismiss civil actions for want of prosecution to "manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases." Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). See also Jourdan, 951 F.2d at 109. Though plaintiff is proceeding pro se, as stated by the Supreme Court, "we have never suggested that procedural rules in ordinary civil litigation should be interpreted so as to excuse mistakes by those who proceed without counsel." McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT plaintiff's case be DISMISSED for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court.

__________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge
JEFFREY MILLER, Plaintiff,

vs. JEFF KNAUER Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-356


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to these proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN DAYS after being served with this Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party may respond to another party's objections within FOURTEEN DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985).

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.

¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.

¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits.

A. Signature

[v] Agent

× [ ] Addressee

B. Received by (Printed Name)

C. Date of Delivery

D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 ? [ ] Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [ ] No

1. Article Addressed to:

3. Service Type

[v] Certified Mail [ ] Express Mail

[ ] Registered [ ] Return Receipt for Merchandise

[ ] Insured Mail [ ] C.O.D.

4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [ ] Yes

2. Article Number

(Transfer from service label) 7002 3150 0000 8389 9753


PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-154C


Summaries of

Miller v. Knauer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 29, 2014
Case No. 1:13-cv-356 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Miller v. Knauer

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JEFF KNAUER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-356 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2014)