From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Harrington

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 5, 2011
CV 09-07684 SJO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)

Opinion


NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-07684 SJO (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all the records and files herein and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Miller v. Harrington

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 5, 2011
CV 09-07684 SJO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Miller v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 5, 2011

Citations

CV 09-07684 SJO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)