From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Greenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

February, 1911.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Defendant was not entitled to a lien upon plaintiff's safe for storage charges. ( Merritt v. Peirano, 10 App. Div. 563.) While defendant may have a cause of action in tort for a trespass upon his premises, this claim is not the proper subject of counterclaim in this action. ( Bernheimer v. Hartmayer, 50 App. Div. 316.) Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Miller v. Greenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Miller v. Greenspan

Case Details

Full title:Henry Miller, Appellant, v. Alexander Greenspan, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1911

Citations

143 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Westbrook

The finding of the lower court that the conversion took place more than three years before the filing of the…

Silbernagel v. Hirsch Distilling Co.

k the Arkansas decisions clearly establish that the consideration of one dollar recited in the contract was…