Miller v. Glunt

Full title: JONATHAN MILLER, Petitioner v. STEVEN GLUNT, et al. Respondents

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1521 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1521

06-28-2012

JONATHAN MILLER, Petitioner v. STEVEN GLUNT, et al. Respondents

J. WILLIAM DITTER

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Commonwealth's Response, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, and Petitioner's objections, I HEREBY ORDER as follows:

1. Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.¹
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

1 Petitioner's Objections to Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation merely restate the issues which Petitioner presented in his habeas petition. As Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation correctly and comprehensively addressed the claims of trial court error presented in Petitioner's habeas petition, Petitioner's objections are overruled.

________________

J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR., J.