From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Gillette

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 15, 1959
267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 316, Docket 25469.

Argued June 2, 1959.

Decided June 15, 1959.

Minniola O. Miller, pro se.

Howard J. Maxwell, of Steele, Collins Maxwell, Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees.

Bernard E. Francis, West Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees Russell L. Gillette and Rose M. Gillette.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


In Miller v. Town of Suffield, 2 Cir., 249 F.2d 16, we affirmed Judge Smith's dismissal of plaintiff's antitrust action which we characterized as an attempt to revive certain "fantastic claims of fraud and conspiracy" rejected in earlier litigation. The Supreme Court denied certiorari, 356 U.S. 978, 78 S.Ct. 1143, 2 L.Ed. 2d 1151, and then a motion for rehearing, 358 U.S. 859, 79 S.Ct. 16, 3 L.Ed.2d 93. After our affirmance Judge Smith, on motion of certain defendants, dissolved an attachment pendente lite upon their property and plaintiff has appealed. She has failed, however, to show any reason why the order was not only within the power of the district court, but also required upon the termination of her action. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Gillette

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 15, 1959
267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Miller v. Gillette

Case Details

Full title:Minniola O. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell L. GILLETTE, Rose M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 1959

Citations

267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

New England Merchants National Bank v. Iran Power Generation & Transmission Co.

And, under the federal rules, a civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court. Fed.R.Civ.P.…

Foreign Exchange Trade v. Oncetur, S.A.

. . ." See Miller v. Gillette, 267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 922, 80 S.Ct. 676, 4…