From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 17, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-090 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:13-CV-090

07-17-2014

CARIN MILLER, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 48), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed thereto, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed on June 23, 2014 is ADOPTED in full;
2. The parties' two stipulations for voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") and Wites & Kapetan, P.A. ("W&K") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (docs. 42, 43) are CONSTRUED as two joint, unopposed motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21;
3. Both motions are GRANTED; and
4. Defendants Experian and W&K are DISMISSED from this case WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Themas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 17, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-090 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Miller v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARIN MILLER, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jul 17, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 3:13-CV-090 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Black v. Reem, Inc.

see also Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 286 F.2d 782, 785 (6th Cir. 1961) (“Rule 41(a)(1) provides for the…