Miller v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

1 Citing case

  1. Lee v. Berryhill

    No. 12-1158 (W.D. Tenn. May. 23, 2017)

    An opinion inconsistent with a claimant's activities of daily living also constitutes "good reason" for declining to give controlling weight. See Dunkle, 2017 WL 815103, at *8; James v. Berryhill, Case No. 5:16CV63, 2017 WL 553309, at *9 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2017); Miller v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Case No. 1:15-CV-0638, 2016 WL 3411663, at *4 (W.D. Mich. June 22, 2016). As previously noted, Dr. Guyton's assessment of marked and extreme limitations were inconsistent with his own treatment records and were not reflected in Lee's activities of daily living.