Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security

Full title: Ruby Miller, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jul 7, 2009

Case No. 1:07cv759 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07cv759.

July 7, 2009

ORDER

MICHAEL BARRETT, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 5, 2009 (Doc. 18).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The EAJA Fee Petition filed by Plaintiff's Counsel (Doc. 17) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Counsel is therefore awarded $3,188.00 in fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.