Opinion
Case No.: CV 13-5148 GW (CWx)
10-29-2015
STEPHEN MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.
Complaint Filed: July 17, 2013
1st AC Filed: August 27, 2013
2nd AC Filed: November 8, 2013
3rd AC Filed: April 4, 2014
4th AC Filed: June 16, 2014
JUDGMENT upon granting defendants' motions for summary judgmenT
JUDGMENT
Defendants' City of Los Angeles, Eric Garcetti, Richard Llewellyn, Delia Ibarra, Andrew Glazier, Steve Fazio, Jimmie Woods-Gray, and Jimmy Hara, M.D. (collectively, "Defendants") Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff Stephen Miller's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, came on regularly for hearing on October 22, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10, the Honorable George H. Wu, District Court Judge Presiding.
The Court fully considered the evidence and arguments presented and, for the reasons set forth in the Court's Tentative Ruling (Dkt. No. 266), which was thereafter adopted as the Court's Final Ruling (Dkt. No. 265), the Court found that there exists no genuine issue of material fact as to any matter upon which Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are based, and that Defendants are thus each entitled to summary judgment against Plaintiff as to the entire action.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
1. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Stephen Miller as to the entire action and as to all the claims contained in Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint;Dated: October 29, 2015
2. That this action is hereby DISMISSED on its merits; and
3. That Defendants are entitled to recover their costs of suit.
/s/_________
Honorable Judge George H. Wu
Judge of the United States District
Court, Central District