Opinion
2:21-cv-2000 KJN P
04-07-2022
ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND BRADFORD, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
By order filed January 20, 2022, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 8, 2022, plaintiff was informed that the filing of the notice of amendment form, standing alone, was insufficient, and was reminded that his amended complaint was due February 20, 2022. (ECF No. 12.) On February 24, 2022, the order was re-served on plaintiff. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.
The order was re-served based on a change of address plaintiff filed in case no. 2:21-cv-1700 KJN. Plaintiff is advised that he is required to file a notice of change of address in each case pending in this court; it is his responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).