From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Abbott Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-CV-366 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12-CV-366

03-21-2013

CRAIG MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABRATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington that this case has successfully mediated and settled in the Court's presence;

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. Abbott Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No.: 3:12-CV-366 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. Abbott Labs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABRATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12-CV-366 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 21, 2013)