From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millbrooks v. Pyle

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 15, 1954
120 N.E.2d 175 (Ind. 1954)

Opinion

No. 0-369.

Filed June 15, 1954.

George Millbrooks filed an action for a writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

George W. Millbrooks, pro se. Hon. Dan Pyle, pro se.


Petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus. The action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the lower court records. See State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N.E.2d 796.

Petition denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 120 N.E.2d 175.


Summaries of

Millbrooks v. Pyle

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 15, 1954
120 N.E.2d 175 (Ind. 1954)
Case details for

Millbrooks v. Pyle

Case Details

Full title:MILLBROOKS v. PYLE, JUDGE OF ST. JOSEPH CIRCUIT COURT

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Jun 15, 1954

Citations

120 N.E.2d 175 (Ind. 1954)
233 Ind. 697

Citing Cases

Spangler v. Daily

1. The petitioner does not bring his action in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the…

McGill v. Rabb

1. The petitioner does not bring his action in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the…