From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milhouse v. Lammer

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 19, 2024
5:23-cv-01205-JGB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-01205-JGB-AJR

03-19-2024

KAREEM MILHOUSE, Petitioner, v. B. LAMMER, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered GRANTING Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Denying Petitioner's Rule 56(d) Motion, and DISMISSING the First Amended Petition WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of exhaustion.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Milhouse v. Lammer

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 19, 2024
5:23-cv-01205-JGB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Milhouse v. Lammer

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM MILHOUSE, Petitioner, v. B. LAMMER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 19, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-01205-JGB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)