From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Weingrad

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 19, 2012
103 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D12–779.

2012-12-19

Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Jennifer Bailey, Judge. Alex Alvarez; Robert S. Glazier, for appellants. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Bruce M. Stanley, Sr., Ft. Myers; Hicks Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, Dinah Stein and Mark Hicks, for appellee.


An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Jennifer Bailey, Judge.
Alex Alvarez; Robert S. Glazier, for appellants. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Bruce M. Stanley, Sr., Ft. Myers; Hicks Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, Dinah Stein and Mark Hicks, for appellee.
Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

WELLS, Chief Judge.

Finding no conflict between our prior opinion in Weingrad v. Miles, 29 So.3d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and the Supreme Court's opinion in American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So.3d 120 (Fla.2011), we affirm.


Summaries of

Miles v. Weingrad

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 19, 2012
103 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Miles v. Weingrad

Case Details

Full title:Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

103 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)