From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MILES v. OTT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 28, 2006
Case Number. 1:05cv647 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Case Number. 1:05cv647.

March 28, 2006


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan filed on January 10, 2006(Doc. 8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff filed a Motion for extension of time to file objections (Doc. 11) which the Court granted. However, as of this date no objections have been filed. Therefore noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired the Court, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Motion to Refile, which this Court construes as a Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (Doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MILES v. OTT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 28, 2006
Case Number. 1:05cv647 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2006)
Case details for

MILES v. OTT

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MILES, Plaintiff(s), v. JOHN OTT, Cincinnati Police Detective…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

Case Number. 1:05cv647 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2006)