From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Collier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
May 4, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv87 (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv87

05-04-2020

JAMES M. MILES v. BRIAN COLLIER, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff James M. Miles, an inmate confined at the Luther Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Factual Background

Plaintiff complains of the conditions of his confinement at the Luther Unit. Plaintiff claims the defendants have acted with deliberate indifference to his health and safety concerning an alleged unreasonable exposure to COVID-19.

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973).

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Here, plaintiff complains of incidents which occurred at the Luther Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice located in Navasota, Grimes County, Texas. When public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside for venue purposes in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case is Grimes County. Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle, 433 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 1976). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Grimes County is located in the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, venue for such claims is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas.

When venue is not proper, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This action should be transferred to the Southern District of Texas. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this the 4th day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

KEITH F. GIBLIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Miles v. Collier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
May 4, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv87 (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Miles v. Collier

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. MILES v. BRIAN COLLIER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: May 4, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv87 (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)