From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MIKEALICE MANAGEMENT CORP. v. BOTCO DEV

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2002
291 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 01-01142

February 1, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Lane, J.), entered November 20, 2000, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI ASSOCIATES, NIAGARA FALLS (JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

SIEGEL, KELLEHER KAHN, BUFFALO (STEVEN G. WISEMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm the order in each appeal for reasons stated in the respective decisions at Supreme Court (Lane, J.). We add only that, although the court erred in finding that the Settlement Agreement between defendants Botco Developments, Inc. and Frank Evangelista had not been submitted to the court, that error does not affect the ultimate conclusions reached by the court.


Summaries of

MIKEALICE MANAGEMENT CORP. v. BOTCO DEV

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2002
291 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

MIKEALICE MANAGEMENT CORP. v. BOTCO DEV

Case Details

Full title:MIKEALICE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOTCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 624